BLACK v. FISCHER

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

9:08-CV-0231 {DNH}.

Attorney(S)

OF COUNSEL: RICHARD BLACK, Plaintiff Pro Se, Bronx, New York. DEAN J. HIGGINS, ESQ., Assistant Attorney General, HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Office of Attorney General, State of New York, Department of Law, The Capitol, Albany, New York.

Judges

David N. Hurd

Acts

The Public Health And Welfare — Civil Rights — Generally — Civil Action For Deprivation Of Rights
Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — United States Magistrate Judges — Court Officers And Employees — Jurisdiction, Powers, And Temporary Assignment

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

RICHARD BLACK, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN FISCHER, Commissioner; LUCIEN J. LECLAIRE, JR., Deputy Commissioner; KENNETH S. PERLMAN, Deputy Commissioner; OMEGA B. ALSTON, Assistant Director; S.R. GERSTEIN, Rabbi; T. STANLEY, Chaplain, Southport Correctional Facility; DAVID NAPOLI, Superintendent, Southport Correctional Facility; A. BARTLETT, Deputy Superintendent; J. COLVIN, Deputy, Superintendent; NORMAN BEZIO, Director of SHU; H. HETRICK, Captain, Southport Correctional Facility; D. TADDER, Correction Officer, Southport Correctional Facility; R. DONAHUE, Lieutenant, Southport Correctional Facility; WILLIAM M. GONZALEZ, Deputy Counsel; and MARK LEONARD, Director of Ministerial, Defendants.

DECISION and ORDER

DAVID HURD, District Judge

Plaintiff, Richard Black, brought this civil rights action in February 2008, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated February 4, 2010, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that defendants' motion (Docket No. 54) be granted, and that all of plaintiff's claims in this action be dismissed. The plaintiff has filed objections to the Report-Recommendation.

Based upon a de novo review of the Report-Recommendation and the entire file, including those portions to which the plaintiff has objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion (Docket No. 54) is GRANTED;

2. All of plaintiff's claims in this action are DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk is directed to file judgment accordingly and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Comments