AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD ISAACS, Appellant.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to set forth findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for its determination in accordance with CPL 440.30 (7), and the appeal is held in abeyance pending the issuance of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for the determination.

In denying the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of conviction, the Supreme Court failed to comply with CPL 440.30 (7), which provides that "[r]egardless of whether a hearing was conducted, the court, upon determining the motion, must set forth on the record its findings of fact, its conclusions of law and the reasons for its determination." Accordingly, the appeal is held in abeyance and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a statement in accordance with CPL 440.30 (7) ( see People v Williams, 184 AD2d 608; People v Brown, 66 AD2d 785).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ISAACS
(Mar 30, 2010)