AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. HemCon, Inc.

ORDER

JOSEPH DiCLERICO JR., District Judge

Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. moves for leave to file two motions in limine after the deadline. The motions in limine seek to preclude HemCon from introducing at trial certain evidence that was disclosed in HemCon's supplementary disclosures. Because the supplementary disclosures were served on Marine Polymer on March 16, 2010, the deadline for filing motions in limine, Marine Polymer could not have filed its motions in response to the supplementary disclosures within the time allowed. That circumstance provides good cause for the late filing. HemCon has not yet responded to the motion for leave.

The final pretrial conference in this case is scheduled for Wednesday, April 7, and evidence in the trial is scheduled to begin on April 19, 2010. The schedule for responses must be shortened.

Conclusion

Marine Polymer's motion for leave to file motions after the deadline (document no. 217) is granted. Marine Polymer shall file immediately the two motions in limine submitted with its motion for leave.

HemCon shall file its responses to the motions no later than noon on Tuesday, April 6, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARINE POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HEMCON, INC. (N.H. 4-1-2010)
(Apr 1, 2010)