Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Paul E

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Paul Smestad appealed from three criminal judgments entered upon his guilty pleas to five felony counts of theft of property and three misdemeanor counts of theft of property. Smestad also appealed from an order revoking his probation from a prior conviction of theft and forgery. Smestad contends the district court erred when it sentenced him as a habitual offender without requiring a presentence investigation and erred in revoking his probation. We affirm underN.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. SMESTAD
(Apr 6, 2010)