Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and the motion of the second third-party defendant/third third-party defendant, Boca Electric Corp., for summary judgment dismissing all causes of action for contribution and common-law indemnification asserted against it is granted; with one bill of costs payable to the appellant.
On January 22, 2003, the plaintiff was performing electrical work on a construction project in Long Island City and allegedly was injured when an electrical panel exploded. At the time of the accident, the plaintiff was employed by the second third-party defendant/third third-party defendant, Boca Electric Corp. (hereinafter Boca).
In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing all causes of action for contribution and common-law indemnification asserted against it, Boca met its burden of demonstrating that the plaintiffs injuries to his right hand did not constitute a "grave injury" within the meaning of Workers' Compensation Law § 11 ( see Marshall v Arias, 12 AD3d 423, 423-424; Aguirre v Castle Am. Constr., 307 AD2d 901; Fitzpatrick v Chase Manhattan Bank, 285 AD2d 487; Trimble v Hawker Dayton Corp., 307 AD2d 452, 453). In opposition, the plaintiff and the defendant third-party plaintiff/third third-party plaintiff, Windsor Place Corp., the owner of the premises where the accident occurred, failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a qualifying grave injury ( see Goodleaf v Tzivos Hashem, Inc., 68 AD3d 817; Aguirre v Castle Am. Constr., 307 AD2d 901; Fitzpatrick v Chase Manhattan Bank, 285 AD2d at 488; Trimble v Hawker Dayton Corp., 307 AD2d at 453).
The remaining contentions of the plaintiff and the defendant/third-party plaintiff/third third-party plaintiff either are without merit or are improperly raised for the first time on appeal.