PANDORA JEWELRY, LLC v. BELLO PARADISO, LLC (E.D.Cal. 4-9-2010)

PANDORA JEWELRY, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. BELLO PARADISO, LLC, a California limited liability company, and DOES 1-50 Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING PANDORA JEWELRY LLC'S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

DALE DROZD, Magistrate JudgePage 2

ORDER

Based on Plaintiff Pandora Jewelry LLC's Motion to File Documents Under Seal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, Pandora's Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Doc. No. 117) is GRANTED. The following exhibits to the Declaration of Jeffrey H. Grant in Support of Pandora's Motion to De-Designate Bello Paradiso LLC's Supplier Information and Documents may be filed under seal:

1. Exhibit A — a true and correct copy of Pandora's Master Purchase and Authorization for Sales to Authorized Retailers agreement bearing bates labels PJ001883-1892 and which is designated as "Confidential Attorney's Eyes Only."

2. Exhibit B — true and correct copies of emails from Bello to its customers which were produced by Bello to Pandora in an excel spreadsheet as bates label BP006001 and marked "Attorney's Eyes Only."

3. Exhibit C — true and copies of relevant excerpts from the deposition of Molly Thompson taken on March 11, 2010 which was designated as "Confidential."

4. Exhibit D — true and copies of relevant excerpts from the deposition of Matthew Davies taken on March 12, 2010 which was designated as "Confidential."

PANDORA JEWELRY, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. BELLO PARADISO, LLC, a California limited liability company, and DOES 1-50 Defendants.

Comments