AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DIANE FEYLER, Respondent, v. OCKE KETELSEN, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The defendant established, prima facie, through the affirmed reports of his medical experts, the plaintiffs medical and hospital records, and the plaintiffs deposition testimony, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident ( see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957; House v MTA Bus Co., 71 AD3d 732). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit any objective medical evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a serious injury to her head or brain within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident ( see House v MTA Bus Co., 71 AD3d 732; Noh v Duffe, 70 AD3d 1017).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FEYLER v. KETELSEN
(Apr 13, 2010)