Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Christopher MADAIO, an indi v. dual and pri

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Christopher Madaio appeals the district court's order, dated March 31, 2008(1) granting summary judgment to the appellee FBI on Madaio's claims for money damages for violations of the Privacy Protection Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000aa et seq.; (2) denying Madaio's motion in limine and motion for more discovery; and (3) striking certain affidavits. Appellant Madaio also appeals the district court's order, dated July 7, 2008, denying Madaio's motion to alter or amend the judgment. After oral argument and review, this Court affirms finding no reversible error.

Nothing herein shall affect Madaio's rights to seek return of any legal property from the FBI under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or as otherwise permitted under law.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MADAIO v. RODEN
(Apr 20, 2010)