Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

This appeal involves the State of Florida, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (Appellant) and Robert A. Boody (Appellee). The matter is an appeal from the Public Employees Relations Commission to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, styled Case No. 1D09-3369. The opinion was filed May 3, 2010, and is issued per curiam.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The opinion is a brief per curiam disposition that contains no stated legal analysis or explanation of its reasoning. The opinion states only the disposition and the concurring judges.

Holding and Implications

AFFIRMED

Direct effect: the district court affirmed the decision under review. The opinion does not discuss broader legal implications or purport to establish new precedent.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Appellant, v. ROBERT A. BOODY, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. BOODY
(May 3, 2010)