Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court has broad discretion in entering dispositional orders ( see Matter of Ashanti B., 62 AD3d 790; Matter of Ariell C., 54 AD3d 1034; Matter of Bruce B., 54 AD3d 1031). "That discretion includes the authority to impose conditions of probation that are reasonably related to rehabilitation" ( Matter of Ashley D., 55 AD3d 605, 606; see Family Ct Act § 353.2 [h]; Penal Law § 65.10, [5]; People v Letterlough, 86 NY2d 259). The Family Court's determination must be accorded great deference ( see Matter of Leonard J., 67 AD3d 911; Matter of Michael D., 60 AD3d 945).
Here, the disposition was appropriate in light of, inter alia, the seriousness and ongoing nature of the incidents which led to the appellant's adjudication as a juvenile delinquent, as well as the recommendations made in the probation report and the mental health services report ( see Matter of Julissa R., 30 AD3d 526, 528; Matter of Michael E., 48 AD3d 810, 811).
The appellant's remaining contention is without merit.