AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ALLEN SIMON et al., Appellants, v. SOL M. USHER et al., Respondents .

Although the moving defendants-made a timely demand for a change of venue, their motion for such relief was untimely. A defendant "may move to change the place of trial within fifteen days after service of the demand," unless the plaintiff consents to the change of venue within five days of service of the demand (CPLR 511 [b]). Here, the motion for a change of venue, made 20 days after service of the demand, must be rejected as untimely ( see Singh v Becher, 249 AD2d 154). Contrary to moving defendants' claim, they were not entitled to the fiveday extension in CPLR 2103 (b) (2) for time periods measured from service by mail ( see Thompson v Cuadrado, 277 AD2d 151). Furthermore, the failure of the remaining defendants to serve a demand to change venue with or prior to their answer was fatal to their request to change venue ( see Kurfis v Shore Towers Condominium, 48 AD3d 300; CPLR 511 [a]).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIMON v. USHER
(May 4, 2010)