Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court did not err in refusing to give an intoxication charge to the jury ( see Penal Law § 15.25). Viewing the intoxication evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant ( see People v Gaines, 83 NY2d 925, 927), we find that it was insufficient to allow a reasonable person to entertain a doubt as to the element of intent (id.; see People v Sirico, 66 AD3d 1047; People v Garcia, 271 AD2d 695; People v Hernandez, 161 AD2d 664; People v Rodriguez, 155 AD2d 627, affd 76 NY2d 918).