AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of JOSEPH MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, Respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A parole determination may be set aside only when the determination to deny the petitioner release on parole evinced `irrationality bordering on impropriety' ( Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69, 77; see Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476). The burden is on the petitioner to make a convincing demonstration of entitlement to such relief ( see Matter of Midgette v New York State Div. of Parole, 70 AD3d 1039, 1040; see Matter of Samuel v Alexander, 69 AD3d 861). The petitioner failed to meet his burden in this case.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE JOSEPH MARTINEZ
(May 18, 2010)