Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

COREY DARRYL WIRSZ, Petitioner, v. JOHN SUGRUE, Respondent.

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 11) ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. 12) THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

JENNIFER THURSTON, Magistrate Judge

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On March 10, 2010, the Court ordered Respondent to file a response by May 12, 2010. (Doc. 8). On May 12, 2010, respondent filed a motion to extend time to file a response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus based upon the need to consult the Office of Enforcement Operations, Criminal Division, and the need to conduct further research regarding Petitioner's claim of entitlement to a treaty transfer. (Doc. 11). On May 17, 2010, Petitioner filed a motion requesting entry of default judgment for Respondent's purported failure to file a timely response. (Doc. 12). Since that motion is based upon the false assumption that Respondent did not timely request an extension of time, it will be denied.

Moreover, good cause having been presented to the Court for Respondent's request for an extension of time, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent's motion to extend time (Doc. 11), is GRANTED. Respondent has thirty (30) days in which to file a Response.
2. Petitioner's motion for default judgment (Doc. 12), is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WIRSZ v. SUGRUE
(May 18, 2010)