AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID NEAL, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court properly found, based on the evidence before it, including, inter alia, the case summary, the presentence report, and the statements of the victim, the defendant, and a witness to the subject crimes, as well as photographic and medical documentation depicting and describing the victim's injuries, that the People demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that an upward departure from level two to level three was warranted in this case ( see People v Rios, 57 AD3d 501, 502; People v Miller, 48 AD3d 774, 774-775; People v Leibach, 39 AD3d 1093, 1093-1094; People v Joslyn, 27 AD3d 1033, 1033-1035).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. NEAL
(May 25, 2010)