Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 17, 2008, is dismissed; and it is further,
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants.
Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to strike the amended complaint based upon her failure to comply with CPLR 3025. The record indicates that the plaintiff served her amended complaint well beyond the period within which an amended pleading may be served as of right ( see CPLR 3025 [a]) without first obtaining leave of the court or the stipulation of the parties ( see Nikolic v Federation Empl. Guidance Serv., Inc., 18 AD3d 522, 524).
The appeal from the order dated March 17, 2008, must be dismissed as abandoned, as the plaintiff does not seek in her brief reversal or modification of any portion of the order ( see Sirma v Beach, 59 AD3d 611, 614; Bibas v Bibas, 58 AD3d 586, 587).
The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit.