AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

WILLIAM MITCHELL HICKS JR., Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT, Oregon State Penitentiary, CAPTAIN SIMS, Oregon State Penitentiary, LT. DERDEN, Oregon State Penitentiary, DR. VARGO, NURSE WANDA, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, Extraction Team, Defendants.

ORDER

PAUL PAPAK, Magistrate Judge

Pending before the court are plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to file an amended complaint (#51), motion in limine (#53), and motion for extension of time (#52) to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted. Plaintiff's amended complaint is due by June 11, 2010. In addition, plaintiff's Motion in Limine is denied as premature. Finally, in view of the fact that plaintiff will be filing an amended complaint, his motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment and defendants' motion for summary judgment are denied as moot.

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (#51) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's amended complaint is due by June 11, 2010. Plaintiff's motion in limine (#53) is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (#52) and defendants' motion for summary judgment (#43) are DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HICKS v. SUPERINTENDENT, OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY (Or. 6-1-2010)
(Jun 1, 2010)