AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL DOZIER, Appellant.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his guilty plea, of two counts of attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 125.25). We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea inasmuch as the record does not support his assertion that the plea was the product of coercion ( see People v Jones, 71 AD3d 1573; People v Spikes, 28 AD3d 1101, 1102, lv denied 7 NY3d 818). Furthermore, the record "establish [es] that the defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty," and we thus reject defendant's challenge to the validity of the waiver of the right to appeal ( People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256). That valid waiver encompasses defendant's challenge to the severity of the sentence ( see id.).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DOZIER
(Jun 11, 2010)