AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GARY FONTANA et al., Respondents, v. CHARLES LAROSA et al., Defendants, and TAMESHWAR AMMAR, Appellant.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The order appealed from, which denied the appellant's motion to preclude certain testimony of the plaintiffs' expert witness or to direct that witness to submit to a hearing pursuant to Frye v United States ( 293 F 1013), was, in effect, an evidentiary ruling. Such a ruling, "even when made in advance of trial on motion papers, constitutes, at best, an advisory opinion which is neither appealable as of right nor by permission" ( Savarese v City of N.Y. Hous. Auth., 172 AD2d 506, 509.]; see Hering v Lighthouse 2001, LLC, 21 AD3d 449, 451-452).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GARY FONTANA v. CHARLES LAROSA
(Jun 15, 2010)