AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

Joseph Griffiths v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, et al.

ORDER

JOSEPH LAPLANTE, District Judge

All of Griffiths's pending motions and petitions (document nos. 64-70, and 72-76) are DENIED. Before making any of these filings, Griffiths filed a notice of appeal, which divested this court of authority to adjudicate this case by placing that authority in the court of appeals. See United States v. Brooks, 145 F.3d 446, 455 (1st Cir. 1998). While this rule has a few limited exceptions, see id. at 456, none of them applies to any of the pending motions or petitions, save for the petitions for transcripts and a PACER account at government expense (document nos. 66-67) and "for Court Disclosures" relative to its rulings in other pro se cases (document no. 72). Those motions, then, are denied: Griffiths has not satisfied the conditions necessary to obtain transcripts at government expense, see 28 U.S.C. § 753(f); there is no fee to register for a PACER account, see www.pacer.gov/reg_pacer.html; and this court's opinions are searchable for free on its publicly available website.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GRIFFITHS v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON
(Jul 1, 2010)