Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number CR 109-127. Motions Motion to dismiss : Denied Motion to dismiss : Denied See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MORGAN CHASE WOODS. ORDER J. HALL, District Judge After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the prior motions to dismiss the indictment are NULLITIES (doc. nos. 44, 56), and Defendant's supplemental motion to dismiss is DENIED (doc. no. 82). In explaining the Court's ruling, a brief procedural history of this case will be helpful. As discussed at length in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Defendant previously filed two motions to dismiss the indictment. (See doc. no. 95, p. 3.) However, because of various developments in the case following the filing of those motions, the Magistrate Judge previously instructed Defendant to, if still appropriate, re-file, inter alia, his prior motions to dismiss to "make his arguments based on the current state of this case." (See id. at 3-4 (citing doc. no. 79, p. 5).) Defendant was informed that upon the filing of his new motion(s), his earlier motions would be treated as nullities, and only those issues raised in the new motion(s) would be considered. (See id. at 4 (citing doc. no. 79, p. 5).) Defendant filed a supplemental motion to dismiss the indictment (doc. no. 82), and the Magistrate Judge based his recommendation on the arguments made in that motion. Accordingly, this Order includes a ruling on the prior motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 44, 56), as well as the supplemental motion to dismiss (doc. no. 82). SO ORDERED, at Augusta, Georgia.