AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

RYAN JUSTUS ANDERSON PLAINTIFF v. GAP, INC. DEFENDANT.

ORDER

DAVID BUNNING, District Judge

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R R) of the United States Magistrate Judge wherein he recommends the case be dismissed without prejudice based upon Plaintiff's failure to effect service on the Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (Doc. #10). In order to provide Plaintiff with adequate notice, on June 24, 2010, the Magistrate Judge entered a Memorandum Order (Doc. #9) notifying Plaintiff of the Court's intent to dismiss and directed Plaintiff to "show cause in writing within TWENTY DAYS . . . why the complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure of service of process." Plaintiff failed to file any response to the Court's Order. Thereafter, on July 15, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued his R R.

No objections to the R R have been filed, and the time to do so has now expired. Upon review of the R R, and the Court being in complete agreement with the analysis and conclusions contained therein, and being otherwise sufficiently advised,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #10) is hereby ADOPTED as the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the Court; and
2. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure of service of process pursuant to Rule 4(m).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ANDERSON v. GAP, INC. (E.D.Ky. 8-3-2010)
(Aug 3, 2010)