AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

MARIO ALBERTO SIMBAQUEBA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant.

ORDER

DUDLEY BOWEN JR., District Judge

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's "Motion to Transfer Action Pursuant [to] 28 U.S.C. § 1404 and Extension of Time to Serve Process" is DENIED as to Plaintiff's request to transfer venue to the Southern District of Florida (doc. no. 12-1), and is deemed MOOT as to his request concerning service (doc. no. 12-2). Additionally, Defendant's motion to dismiss or in the alternative motion for transfer of venue (doc. no. 16) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Defendant's request that Plaintiff's case be dismissed is DENIED, but Defendant's request that Plaintiff's case be transferred is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court in the Southern District of Ohio for further consideration, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to forward the file to that District immediately, and this civil action is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIMBAQUEBA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
(Jul 29, 2010)