AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

TAMMY WHITE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE.

ORDER

MARY McLAUGHLIN, District Judge

AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2010, upon consideration of the plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Docket No. 10); the defendant's opposition, the plaintiff's reply, and the defendant's sur-reply thereto; the plaintiff's supplemental authority to its motion and the defendant's response thereto; and the defendant's supplemental authority in opposition to the plaintiff's motion; and for the reasons set forth in a Memorandum of today's date; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion to remand is DENIED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file a response to the defendant's Motion for Change of Venue (Docket No. 4) on or before August 19, 2010. The defendant shall then have one week to file a brief in reply.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHITE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
(Aug 5, 2010)