AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

TINA L MOORE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J ASTRUE, Defendant.

ORDER

MAURICE PAUL, Senior District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 21, Report and Recommendation regarding the Complaint, Doc. 1. The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the decision of the Commissioner to deny benefits be affirmed. No party has objected, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 21, is ADOPTED and incorporated herein.
2. The decision of the Commissioner to deny benefits is AFFIRMED.
DONE AND ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MOORE v. ASTRUE
(Aug 30, 2010)