Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

Robert Banks v. Mark Hall, et al.

ORDER

JOSEPH DiCLERICO JR., District Judge

Robert Banks, who is incarcerated and proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, sued New Hampshire State Troopers Mark Hall, Robert Lima, Dean Holston, Francesco Campo, Michael Cedrone, Gerard Ditolla, and Chad Lavoie, as well as the New Hampshire state treasurer and Kia, a police dog, alleging that the troopers used excessive force on him during his arrest. The defendants filed a motion on August 4, 2010, for leave to depose Banks on August 23, 2010, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B). Banks did not respond to the motion.

An opposing party is allowed fourteen days to respond to a motion, with additional time allowed for service. LR 7.1(b); Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(d). Under the rules, the defendants' motion was not ripe until August 23, 2010, the day the deposition was scheduled. Therefore, the time scheduled for the deposition has passed, and presumably the deposition was not held. The defendants have not filed a new motion for leave or otherwise addressed the untimeliness of their motion.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion for leave to depose the plaintiff (document no. 28) is denied as moot, without prejudice to file a new motion for leave to depose the plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

September 1, 2010

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BANKS v. HALL
(Sep 1, 2010)