Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Jamie R. KAMPE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Kampe appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion. He says his plea counsel failed to litigate a motion to suppress that would have been meritorious and resulted in all incriminating evidence being suppressed. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAMPE v. STATE
(Sep 7, 2010)