AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

RICHARD BROWN PLAINTIFF v. OFFICER THOMAS M. "MIKE" MULLINS DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

W. PEPPER JR., District Judge

This cause is before the Court on the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [29]. The Court, having reviewed the motion, the movant's brief and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds as follows, to-wit:

Defendant filed his motion seeking summary judgment on grounds of qualified immunity on May 18, 2010. Plaintiff, to date, has not responded to the pending motion. Review of the record before the Court reveals that the defendant has asserted his qualified immunity claim in good faith. Accordingly, plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating a triable issue of fact on the issue. His failure to respond to the motion for summary judgment compels the conclusion that he has not met that burden. Accordingly,

Review of the evidence of record to date likewise convinces the Court that plaintiff can establish neither a violation of a clearly established constitutional right nor that Officer Mullin's actions were objectively unreasonable under the circumstances.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [29] is well-taken and should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.

SO ORDERED, this the 28th day of September, 2010.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BROWN v. MULLINS
(Sep 28, 2010)