AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

ALBERT G. BARON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

ORDER

NORMAN MOON, District Judge

This matter is before the court on consideration of the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of United States Magistrate Judge Michael F. Urbanski, Plaintiffs objections, the response to the objections filed by the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"), and Plaintiffs reply to the response. As explained in the accompanying memorandum opinion, I have undertaken a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which specific objections were made, and I find that Plaintiff's objections are without merit; that the magistrate judge was correct in finding that the Commissioner's final decision is supported by substantial evidence; and that Plaintiff did not meet his burden of establishing that he was totally disabled from all forms of substantial gainful employment.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: Plaintiff's objections (docket no. 19) are OVERRULED; the magistrate judge's Report (docket no. 18) is ADOPTED in toto; the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 13) is GRANTED; Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 11) is DENIED; and this action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of the court.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a certified copy of this order and the accompanying memorandum opinion to all counsel of record and to United States Magistrate Judge Michael F. Urbanski.

It is so ORDERED.

Entered this 30th day of September, 2010.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARON v. ASTRUE
(Sep 30, 2010)