AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

ROGER THORSON PLAINTIFF v. CHRISTOPHER EPPS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

DAVID SANDERS, Magistrate Judge

BEFORE THE COURT is the plaintiff's motion request for site inspection (# 40). The plaintiff essentially seeks permission to enter, inspect, and photograph specified areas of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, including the execution chamber. The plaintiff cites Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as authority for the motion. However, because the plaintiff has made no allegation that the requested discovery is being withheld or otherwise objected to and because L. U. Civ. R. 5(d)(3) specifically provides that requests for inspection under Rule 34 should not be filed with the court, the motion is hereby terminated.

SO ORDERED this 1st day of October, 2010.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THORSON v. EPPS
(Oct 1, 2010)