AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of LAWRENCE J. MATTAR, for an Order Authorizing the Sale of Certain Real Property Belonging to AIDA C, an Incapacitated Person, Respondent, v. ROSANNA E. HECKL et al., Appellants.

Memorandum: Respondents, the children of Aida C, an incapacitated person (hereafter, IP) ( Matter of Aida C, 66 AD3d 1344), appeal from an order that, inter alia, granted the petition of the guardian of the IP's property seeking to sell certain real property pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 81.21 (b). Respondents contend that Supreme Court erred in failing to set forth its reasons for granting the petition as required by section 81.21 (e), and they seek to have the contract of sale rescinded. The sale of the property in question to a third party closed more than one year before respondents perfected their appeal. "`[U]nder the well-established doctrine of merger, provisions in a contract for the sale of real estate merge into the deed and are thereby extinguished absent the parties' demonstrated intent that a provision shall survive transfer of title'" ( Arnold v Wilkins, 61 AD3d 1236, 1236). Thus, the contract provisions have merged into the deed, and the contract may not be rescinded. Where, as here, "the rights of the parties cannot be affected by the determination of [the] appeal," the appeal must be dismissed as moot ( Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE LAWRENCE
(Oct 1, 2010)