AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN PIPKIN, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, on substantial justice grounds, the defendant's motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 ( see CPL 440.46; see also L 2004, ch 738, § 23). The defendant had been convicted of two prior violent felonies, and during his approximately 10-year incarceration on the instant offense, he received disciplinary tickets for twelve tier II and five tier III infractions, including tickets for violent conduct and possessing contraband ( see People v Winfield, 59 AD3d 747, 747-748; People v Perez, 57 AD3d 921, 922; People v Flores, 50 AD3d 1156, 1156-1157).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PIPKIN
(Oct 12, 2010)