AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

FOOD SCIENCES CORPORATION d/b/a ROBARD CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM M. NAGLER, Defendant.

ORDER

JEROME SIMANDLE, District Judge

This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint in response to this Court's dismissal of the original Complaint [Docket Item 43]; the Court having considered the submissions of the parties; for the reasons explained in the Opinion of today's date; and for good cause;

IT IS this 20th day of October, 2010 hereby

ORDERED that this docket is RE-OPENED for further proceedings; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, but the Amended Complaint shall not include claims arising from the operation of the post-disclaimer version of Dr. Nagler's website; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file its Amended Complaint consistent with today's Opinion and Order within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FOOD SCIENCES CORPORATION v. NAGLER
(Oct 20, 2010)