BENEDICT v. WHITMAN BREED ABBOTT MORGAN

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 2007-07402, 2007-07403, 2007-07404.

Attorney(S)

Patrick J. Carr, as Executor of the Estate of Elena Duke Benedict, Scarsdale, N.Y., appellant pro se. Frankel Abrams, New York, N.Y. (Stuart E. Abrams
M. Breeze McMennamin of counsel), for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-

Judges

Peter B. Skelos
Ruth C. Balkin
Plummer E. Lott

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 2007-07402, 2007-07403, 2007-07404.

Attorney(S)

Patrick J. Carr, as Executor of the Estate of Elena Duke Benedict, Scarsdale, N.Y., appellant pro se. Frankel Abrams, New York, N.Y. (Stuart E. Abrams
M. Breeze McMennamin of counsel), for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-

Judges

Peter B. Skelos
Ruth C. Balkin
Plummer E. Lott

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

PATRICIA E. BENEDICT et al., Respondents, v. WHITMAN BREED ABBOTT MORGAN et al., Respondents, and RICHARD A. PIEMONTE, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, et al., Defendants. PATRICK J. CARR, as Executor of ELENA DUKE BENEDICT, Deceased, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as academic, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, in light of our determination in Benedict v Whitman Breed Abbott Morgan ( 77 AD3d 870 [decided herewith]).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

PATRICIA E. BENEDICT et al., Respondents, v. WHITMAN BREED ABBOTT MORGAN et al., Respondents, and RICHARD A. PIEMONTE, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, et al., Defendants. PATRICK J. CARR, as Executor of ELENA DUKE BENEDICT, Deceased, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Comments