Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

CAMILO JORDAN, also known as Camilo Jordon, Plaintiff, v. RABINOWITZ; MR. RAMINENI; FERGUSON; HARRIS; PHILLIPS; and KENNETH S. PERLMAN, Defendants.

DECISION and ORDER

DAVID HURD, District Judge

Plaintiff, Camilo Jordan, commenced this civil rights action in December 2008, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated August 24, 2010, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 30) dismissing plaintiff's complaint be granted and that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed in its entirety. Plaintiff requested, and was granted, an extension of time in which to submit objections to the Report-Recommendation; and further requested a court-appointed attorney to assist him in his response. However, no objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.

Based upon a careful review of the file, and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Peebles, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects.See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 30) is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety;

3. Plaintiff's request for a court-appointed attorney is DENIED as moot; and

3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 1, 2010

Utica, New York.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JORDAN v. RABINOWITZ
(Nov 1, 2010)