AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of EDWIN GARCIA, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH T. SMITH, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

After petitioner, a prison inmate, surrendered a package of crackers containing poppy seeds, he was served with a misbehavior report charging him with possession of contraband. Petitioner was found guilty following a tier II disciplinary hearing, and that determination was upheld on administrative appeal with a reduction in the penalty assessed. He thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. Petitioner's only contention is that the Hearing Officer was biased and predisposed to a finding of guilt. However, inasmuch as petitioner admitted at the hearing that he possessed the crackers with poppy seeds in clear violation of 7 NYCRR 270.2 (B) (14) (xix), the record shows that the finding of guilt flowed from the evidence presented, rather than any alleged hearing officer bias ( see Matter of Covington v Smith, 75 AD3d 708, 708; Matter of Hayes v Fischer, 70 AD3d 1085, 1086).

Supreme Court properly transferred the proceeding inasmuch as petitioner raised the issue of substantial evidence in his petition, but that issue has been abandoned because petitioner failed to raise it in his brief ( see Matter of Austin v Fischer, 70 AD3d 1074, 1074 n [2010]; Matter of Polite v Goord, 49 AD3d 944, 944 n [2008]).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE GARCIA
(Nov 10, 2010)