AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of Louis J. JACKSON, Appellant, v. DEBBRA K. BEACH et al., Respondents.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner father, as limited by his brief, contends on appeal that Family Court erred in dismissing his petition seeking modification of a prior custody order with prejudice following a hearing. Contrary to the father's contention, there is a sound and substantial basis in the record for the court's determination that the father did not make a sufficient showing of a change in circumstances to warrant an inquiry into whether the best interests of the subject child would be served by a change in custody ( see Matter of Amy L.M. v Kevin M.M., 31 AD3d 1224, 1225; see generally Matter of Perry v Korman, 63 AD3d 1564, 1565; Matter of McLeod v McLeod, 59 AD3d 1011). Indeed, the father failed to make "the requisite evidentiary showing of a `change of circumstances warranting a reexamination of the existing custody arrangement `"( Amy L.M., 31 AD3d at 1225).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE JACKSON
(Nov 12, 2010)