AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of ARRLIS CARMEN S., Respondent, v. DANIEL H., Appellant.

The best interests of a child, which is the foremost consideration in matters of custody and visitation, is within the discretion of the hearing court whose determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a sound and substantial evidentiary basis ( Corsell v Cornell, 101 AD2d 766, 767). There is an evidentiary basis here for the court's finding that unsupervised visitation would have a negative impact on the child's well-being ( see Matter of Frank M. v Donna W., 44 AD3d 495). Respondent refused an offer of supervised visitation. Under these circumstances, the court providently exercised its discretion in suspending his visitation.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE ARRLIS CARMEN
(Nov 16, 2010)