AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FORT PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN MASTER LEASE LLC, Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER ON MOTION

Fort Properties, Inc. moves to lift the stay of the briefing schedule and for leave to withdraw Seth H. Ostrow and Ostrow Kaufman Frankl LLP as counsel. American Master Lease LLC moves to remand this case to the district court for further proceedings.

American Master Lease has not demonstrated in its motion why remand may be appropriate. We deny the motion without prejudice to American Master Lease making arguments in its brief concerning remand. Because American Master Lease filed its opening brief before the Supreme Court issued its decision in Bilski v. Kappos, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 3218, 177 L.Ed.2d 792 (2010), we deem the better course is to require the appellant to file a new opening brief which may also include any arguments about recent case law.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) American Masters Lease LLC's motion to remand is denied without prejudice.

(2) Fort Properties, Inc.'s motions are granted. The stay of the briefing schedule is lifted. The appellant is directed to file a replacement opening brief within 45 days of the date of filing of this order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FORT PROPERTIES v. AMERICAN MASTER LEASE
(Dec 1, 2010)