Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

JAMES BURNEY, Petitioner, v. SIMON WAINWRIGHT et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM

REGGIE WALTON, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the federal respondents' opposition to the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus. By Order issued on September 30, 2010, the petitioner was advised to respond to the opposition by November 5, 2010, or risk summary denial of the petition and dismissal of the case. The petitioner has neither filed a response nor sought additional time to do so. The Court therefore will dismiss the case on the respondents' conceded arguments. See Local Civil Rule 7(b); Slovinec v. Amer. Univ., 520 F. Supp. 2d 107, 111 (D.D.C. 2007) (treating uncontested arguments as conceded).

A separate final order accompanies this Memorandum.

Date: December 1, 2010

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BURNEY v. WAINWRIGHT
(Dec 1, 2010)