Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re Ex parte W.E. and S.E. (J.L. v. W.E. and S.E.).

LYONS, Justice.

WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.

COBB, C.J., and WOODALL, PARKER, and SHAW, JJ., concur.

MURDOCK, J., concurs specially.

STUART and BOLIN, JJ., dissent.

MURDOCK, Justice (concurring specially).

I do not take issue with the result reached by the Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion in this case. J.L. v. W.E., [Ms. 2090210, July 23, 2010] 64 So.3d 631 (Ala. Civ.App. 2010). I write, however, to note that dependency is a status created by law that either is true of a child or is not. That is, either a child is dependent or it is not. A child cannot be dependent vis-á-vis one parent but not dependent as to the other parent. If the child is not dependent "as to one parent," then the child is not dependent. In this case, L.L. is no longer dependent, and I concur in the denial of certiorari review.

See Ala. Code 1975, § 12-15-102(8)a.2., defining a "dependent child" as including a child "[w]ho is without a parent, legal guardian, or legal custodian willing and able to provide for the care, support, or education of the child."

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE W.E
(Dec 3, 2010)