SEAN S. v. CAESAR

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 2009-10905, (Docket No. N-22850-09).

Attorney(S)

Edward E. Caesar, Brooklyn, N.Y., nonparty-appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Stephen McGrath and Elina Drucker of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Emmanuel F. Ntiamoah, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent-respondent Benito S. Jessica Marcus, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent-respondent Tracy B.

Judges

Reinaldo E. Rivera
Thomas A. Dickerson
Plummer E. Lott
Sheri S. Roman

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 2009-10905, (Docket No. N-22850-09).

Attorney(S)

Edward E. Caesar, Brooklyn, N.Y., nonparty-appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Stephen McGrath and Elina Drucker of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Emmanuel F. Ntiamoah, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent-respondent Benito S. Jessica Marcus, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent-respondent Tracy B.

Judges

Reinaldo E. Rivera
Thomas A. Dickerson
Plummer E. Lott
Sheri S. Roman

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

In the Matter of SEAN S., an Infant. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; BENITO S. et al., Respondents. EDWARD E. CAESAR, Nonparty Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The attorney for the child failed to demonstrate that the psychologist's services were "necessary" (County Law § 722-c; see Matter of Garfield M., 128 AD2d 876). Accordingly, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the application pursuant to County Law § 722-c to have the psychologist examine the child.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

In the Matter of SEAN S., an Infant. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; BENITO S. et al., Respondents. EDWARD E. CAESAR, Nonparty Appellant.

Comments