Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Bruce WOLOSKY, Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF the STATE of Ne

The Almase Law Group LLC

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the district court's denial of petitioner Bruce Wolosky's motion to be released on his own recognizance. We previously granted a stay and directed the State to file an answer. Wolosky v. Dist. Ct., Docket No. 57402 (Order Directing Answer, December 27, 2010). On January 3, 2011, the State filed an Emergency Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Stay and Directing Answer. Because the State's motion addresses the substantive issues raised by petitioner, we elect to treat the State's motion as an answer.

Having considered the documentation presented to this court, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ is not warranted. Wolosky claims that he is entitled to release because he has been held on a fugitive warrant in excess of 90 days. However, because Wolosky was re-arrested under warrant of the Governor within 90 days of initial arrest, there was no basis upon which to release him from custody. See NRS 179.207 –.211; Schumm v. Nelson, 659 P.2d 1389, 1390–91 (Colo.1983).

Therefore, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

We lift the stay imposed by this court on December 27, 2010.
--------

--------

Notes:

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Wolosky v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.
(Jan 3, 2011)