Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

CATHERINE LATAILLADE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PRO SE DIVISION RM. 230, Defendant.

ORDER

LEONARD STARK, District Judge

WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Thynge issued a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 26) dated September 9, 2010, concerning a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter filed by defendant (D.I. 7);

WHEREAS, the Report recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be granted;

WHEREAS, any Objections to the Report and Recommendation were to be filed by September 27, 2010;

WHEREAS, neither party has filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation;

WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted for the reasons stated by Magistrate Judge Thynge in her Report and Recommendation (D.I. 26);

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (D.I. 26) is ADOPTED and the Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 7) is GRANTED .

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the dismissal of the instant action, Plaintiff's motions to seal (D.I. 10), for electronic notification (D.I. 13), and to stop government (D.I. 18) are DENIED AS MOOT . For the same reason, Defendant's Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 19) is DENIED AS MOOT .

Dated: January 3, 2011

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LATAILLADE v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT
(Jan 3, 2011)