AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of ARAYNNAH B., an Infant. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; MOSHAMMET R., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of AMIR R., an Infant. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; MOSHAMMET R., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.).

Ordered that the order dated January 27, 2010, is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court should have held a hearing on the mother's motion pursuant to Family Court Act § 1061 to modify the order of disposition ( see Matter of Angelina AA., 222 AD2d 967, 969). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, to conduct a hearing. We take no position as to whether the mother's request to modify the dispositional order to an order suspending judgment pursuant to Family Court Act § 1052 (a) (i) should be granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE ARAYNNAH B
(Jan 11, 2011)