AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES STRONG, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not voluntary because it was coerced is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground or raise this issue before the Supreme Court ( see CPL 470.05; People v Johnson, 70 AD3d 721; People v Antoine, 59 AD3d 560; People v Perez, 51 AD3d 1043 ). In any event, the Supreme Court's remarks during the plea proceedings regarding the defendant's possible sentence exposure were he to proceed to trial were informative, not coercive ( see People v Bravo, 72 AD3d 697, 698; People v Miranda, 67 AD3d 709, 710; People v Pagan, 297 AD2d 582; People v Samuel, 208 AD2d 776).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. STRONG
(Jan 18, 2011)