AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEONARDO ROSARIO, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment and the resentence are affirmed.

The defendant's only contentions on these appeals, that the sentence and resentence were excessive, are without merit ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis now to complain that the sentence and resentence were excessive ( see People v Hidalgo, 120 AD2d 675; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ROSARIO
(Jan 25, 2011)