COLLEEN KOTELLY, District Judge
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is, this 18th day of January, 2011, hereby
The Court incorporates herein the defined terms in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion.
ORDERED that Petitioner's [218] Motion for Disclosure is DENIED in its entirety; it is further
ORDERED that the Government's [221] Motion to Confirm is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART, as follows:
(a) The motion is GRANTED as it relates to the Category 1 Information;
(b) The motion is GRANTED as it relates to the Category 2 Information;
(c) The motion is GRANTED as it relates to the Category 3 Information, with the exception of the Category 3 Excluded Statements;
(d) The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as it relates to the Category 3 Excluded Statements; and
(e) The motion is otherwise DENIED as moot; it is further
ORDERED that the Category 1 Information, the Category 2 Information, and the Category 3 Information (with the exception of the Category 3 Excluded Statements), are deemed to be "protected information," as that term is used in the [57] Protective Order in this action; it is further
ORDERED that the parties shall promptly meet and confer in person regarding the proper designation of the Category 3 Excluded Statements; and it is further
ORDERED that, on or before February 21, 2011, the Government shall either (a) file a notice with the Court indicating that an agreement has been reached between the parties as to the proper designation of the Category 3 Excluded Statements, or (b) file a second, and final, motion to confirm the protected status of such information addressing the concerns identified in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion.
SO ORDERED.