The motion court correctly found that the new facts presented by plaintiff are "not very different" from those previously alleged, and do not warrant a change in the prior determination (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]). Plaintiff does not allege any injury recoverable under RICO ( 18 USC § 1964 [c]; see Laborers Local 17 Health Benefit Fund v Philip Morris, Inc., 191 F3d 229, 241 [2d Cir 1999], cert denied 528 US 1080), and New York does not recognize an independent tort cause of action for civil conspiracy ( see Jebran v LaSalle Bus. Credit, LLC, 33 AD3d 424, 425). Plaintiff failed to satisfy the statutory prerequisites for class certification ( see CPLR 901, 902).