Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

LISA BAIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and McKESSON CORPORATION, Defendants. LISA SAUNDERS, et al., Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge

Plaintiffs in these related cases and Defendants AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation jointly move for leave to file under seal documents related to their stipulated motion for an "Order Establishing a Qualified Settlement Fund and Appointing Fund Administrator" (Stipulated Motion).

Because the public interest favors filing all court documents in the public record, any party seeking to file a document under seal must demonstrate good cause to do so. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass'n, 565 F.3d 1106, 1115 (9th Cir. 2009). This cannot be established simply by showing that the document is subject to a protective order or by stating in general terms that the material is considered to be confidential, but rather must be supported by a sworn declaration demonstrating with particularity the need to file each document under seal. See Civil L.R. 79-5(a).

In the declaration supporting their motion to seal, the parties indicate that they have entered into a Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), which involves the establishment of a Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF). They assert that both "the MSA and the QSF contain and concern confidential, private and sensitive settlement information." Dunlap Decl. ¶ 3.

Not all of the documents the parties seek to file under seal appear to implicate information regarding the MSA and the QSF. The stipulation filed in support of the motion contains specific, detailed information about the settlement. However, the Stipulated Motion does not appear to contain such information. Requests for leave to file documents under seal must be narrowly tailored. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(a).

Accordingly, the parties' motion to seal is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice. The "Stipulation with Respect to Motion Regarding Plaintiffs' Request for Administrative Relief and for Order Establishing a Qualified Settlement Fund and Appointing Fund Administrator" may be filed under seal. Within three days of the date of this Order, the parties may renew their motion for leave to file their Stipulated Motion under seal, so long as they proffer a declaration establishing the Stipulated Motion's sealability. In the alternative, they shall file the Stipulated Motion in the public record within three days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 2/7/2011

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAIN v. ASTRAZENECA LP
(Feb 7, 2011)